I have just been reading some more DP2M vs 'Other camera' debates and the thing which seems to escape most people is that the image simply 'looks' different ( in a good way) to files from other types of sensor.
It's in the eyes of the beholder. I have a 5D3 which I use with L and Zeiss glass usually mounted on a rock solid RRS tripod/head. The files from the DP2M simply blow away the 5D3 files in terms of colour, resolution and, what is it? Sharpness? Microcontrast? It's is the unique Foveon look I guess. But this is simply my opinion, based on my own personal preferences.
Whatever, I'm still in shock at the quality of these DP2M files. Unbloodybelievable....
It's in the eyes of the beholder. I have a 5D3 which I use with L and Zeiss glass usually mounted on a rock solid RRS tripod/head. The files from the DP2M simply blow away the 5D3 files in terms of colour, resolution and, what is it? Sharpness? Microcontrast? It's is the unique Foveon look I guess. But this is simply my opinion, based on my own personal preferences.
Whatever, I'm still in shock at the quality of these DP2M files. Unbloodybelievable....
No comments:
Post a Comment